Re: [PATCH -tip 5/4] Expands irq-off region in text_poke()

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Masami Hiramatsu (mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> * Ingo Molnar (mingo@xxxxxxx) wrote:
>>>>> * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -523,14 +526,17 @@ void *__kprobes text_poke(void *addr, co
>>>>>>  		pages[1] = virt_to_page(addr + PAGE_SIZE);
>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>  	BUG_ON(!pages[0]);
>>>>>> -	if (!pages[1])
>>>>>> -		nr_pages = 1;
>>>>>> -	vaddr = vmap(pages, nr_pages, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
>>>>>> -	BUG_ON(!vaddr);
>>>>>> -	local_irq_disable();
>>>>>> +	local_irq_save(flags);
>>>>>> +	set_fixmap(FIX_TEXT_POKE0, page_to_phys(pages[0]));
>>>>>> +	if (pages[1])
>>>>>> +		set_fixmap(FIX_TEXT_POKE1, page_to_phys(pages[1]));
>>>>>> +	vaddr = (char *)fix_to_virt(FIX_TEXT_POKE0);
>>>>>>  	memcpy(&vaddr[(unsigned long)addr & ~PAGE_MASK], opcode, len);
>>>>>> -	local_irq_enable();
>>>>>> -	vunmap(vaddr);
>>>>>> +	clear_fixmap(FIX_TEXT_POKE0);
>>>>>> +	if (pages[1])
>>>>>> +		clear_fixmap(FIX_TEXT_POKE1);
>>>>>> +	local_flush_tlb();
>>>>>> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
>>>>>>  	sync_core();
>>>>> I'm not sure at all about this widening of the irq-atomic 
>>>>> section and the idea of allowing non-locked access on single-CPU 
>>>>> situations - we dont really want to micro-optimize any of this 
>>>>> on such a level, holding the text lock is a robust rule all code 
>>>>> should be listening to. (Creating locking assymetry always 
>>>>> inserts a certain amount of fragility - adding to an already 
>>>>> fragile concept here.)
>>>>>
>>>>> And note that there's no reason why text_poke could not be used 
>>>>> in stop_machine_run() - the stop_machine_run() handler must not 
>>>>> take the text_lock of course - but outside code calling 
>>>>> stop_machine_run() can do it and can hence serialize properly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that even if we did this then your v2 patch is not fully 
>>>>> correct: you need to move the sync_core() at the end of the 
>>>>> sequence inside the critical section too. (right now this is 
>>>>> mostly harmless because the INVLPG inside the clear_fixmap() 
>>>>> happens to be serializing so it has an implicit sync_core() 
>>>>> property - but nevertheless we better do this straight away to 
>>>>> not cause problems later down the line.)
>>>>>
>>>>> 	Ingo
>>>> Agreed. The alternatives_smp_lock/alternatives_smp_unlock 
>>>> specific case does not bring us much if it has no perceivable 
>>>> performance impact. It's better to keep a standard interface 
>>>> and clear requirements.
>>> Note that i dont object to another aspect of this same change: 
>>> the fact that it makes the whole sequence more atomic and more 
>>> defensive [which is never bad of fragile interfaces].
>>>
>>> I only got worried about the "lets use this without the text 
>>> lock" ideas.
>>>
>>> So if Masami-san sends a delta patch with a different changelog 
>>> and with the sync_core() bit moved inside the critical section, 
>>> i'll apply that too.
>> OK, here is the delta patch.
>>
>> Expand irq-atomic region to cover fixmap using code and sync_core.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c |    4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6-tip/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
>> +++ linux-2.6-tip/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
>> @@ -526,13 +526,12 @@ void *__kprobes text_poke(void *addr, co
>>  		pages[1] = virt_to_page(addr + PAGE_SIZE);
>>  	}
>>  	BUG_ON(!pages[0]);
>> +	local_irq_save(flags);
>>  	set_fixmap(FIX_TEXT_POKE0, page_to_phys(pages[0]));
>>  	if (pages[1])
>>  		set_fixmap(FIX_TEXT_POKE1, page_to_phys(pages[1]));
>>  	vaddr = (char *)fix_to_virt(FIX_TEXT_POKE0);
>> -	local_irq_save(flags);
>>  	memcpy(&vaddr[(unsigned long)addr & ~PAGE_MASK], opcode, len);
>> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
>>  	clear_fixmap(FIX_TEXT_POKE0);
>>  	if (pages[1])
>>  		clear_fixmap(FIX_TEXT_POKE1);
>> @@ -540,6 +539,7 @@ void *__kprobes text_poke(void *addr, co
>>  	sync_core();
>>  	/* Could also do a CLFLUSH here to speed up CPU recovery; but
>>  	   that causes hangs on some VIA CPUs. */
>> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
>>  	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>>  		BUG_ON(((char *)addr)[i] != ((char *)opcode)[i]);
> 
> I think irq off should cover the BUG_ON too. This safety check assumes
> we are the only ones modifying "addr".

I think others don't change without text_mutex, don't it?

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/