Re: [PATCH 1/2] gigaset: return -ENOSYS for unimplemented functions

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Sat Mar 07 2009 - 17:27:40 EST


On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 23:10:57 +0100 (CET)
Tilman Schmidt <tilman@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> A number of functions in the usb_gigaset module will return -EINVAL if
> CONFIG_GIGASET_UNDOCREQ is not set. Make these return -ENOSYS as it's
> more specific and it might make it easier to see (from userspace) why
> these functions actually fail.
>
> Impact: some error return codes changed

ENODEV is what would be more appropriate.

ENOSYS shuoldn't be returned from drivers, only from unimplemented
system calls!


--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/