Re: printk issue - bug?

[Robert Hancock]

Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> 2009/3/7 Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > ie offset is a 64-bit type but the printk format for it is %x, which
> > presumably only consumes 32 bits on SH4?  Seems like your code is buggy
> > and you ignored a compiler warning about printk format mismatch?
> >
> >  - R.
>
> Yes, loff_t is a long long  but why did it work in the first line and
> not the second?

It didn't. You didn't print loff_t in the first printk, and the variable 
size mismatch corrupted the next value being printed in the second one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/