Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/24] xen: mask XSAVE from cpuid

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:05:26 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > This is indicative of something that might be a huge bug in Xen:
> > Xen should never ever pass through CPUID bits it does not know.
> > If Xen does not honor that, there is a fundamental and eternally
> > recurring problem.... every time something new gets introduced Xen
> > likely breaks.
> 
> Yes, I'd agree; Xen should whitelist cpu capabilities rather than 
> blacklist them.  Jan expressed the opposite opinion (on the grounds
> that it precludes using features which don't require special OS or
> hypervisor support without Xen modifications).

Well.. pretty much all new instructions need Xen modifications due to
the need to be emulate to deal with traps/vmexits/etc right? 
So I don't quite see many cpuid bits that would NOT involve some Xen
modification or another ;)



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/