Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM corechanges

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>> First off, the non-staging patches need more complete changelog entries,
>> a bit of meaning goes a long way. I'll ack them if they are documented and
>> make sense. The unlocked ioctl hook makes sense to me at least!
>>   
>
> For the non-staging patches, (which also sit in the modesetting-newttm 
> tree), I can add some more elaborate comments. However I think all of
> them are targeted to support functionality for TTM, so unless the TTM
> code goes into staging or mainstream, there is little point in merging
> them to core drm before other drivers find them useful.
>
> Although I see the patch adding TTM is including some backwards
> compatibility defines (In particular the PAT compat stuff) that needs
> to be stripped.

Great, care to respin it and send it to me?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/