Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM corechanges

[Thomas Hellström]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>   
> > > First off, the non-staging patches need more complete changelog entries,
> > > a bit of meaning goes a long way. I'll ack them if they are documented and
> > > make sense. The unlocked ioctl hook makes sense to me at least!
> > >   
> > >       
> > For the non-staging patches, (which also sit in the modesetting-newttm 
> > tree), I can add some more elaborate comments. However I think all of
> > them are targeted to support functionality for TTM, so unless the TTM
> > code goes into staging or mainstream, there is little point in merging
> > them to core drm before other drivers find them useful.
> >
> > Although I see the patch adding TTM is including some backwards
> > compatibility defines (In particular the PAT compat stuff) that needs
> > to be stripped.
> >     
>
> Great, care to respin it and send it to me?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>   
Greg,
A clean TTM patch was sent to Intel with the other patches.
I'm not sure why it got lost along the way?

/Thomas




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/