Re: [patch] fix uml slowness caused by ptrace preemption bug on host

[Miklos Szeredi]

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I'm no scheduler expert and I don't know whether the exact placement in
> your change is the optimal one.  But it's certainly fine from a ptrace
> perspective.

I'm no scheduler expert either.

Maybe a more generic solution in the scheduler (something like this
totally untested patch) would be better?  What say you, scheduler
experts?

Thanks,
Miklos


Index: linux.git/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.git.orig/kernel/sched.c	2009-03-18 12:53:47.000000000 +0100
+++ linux.git/kernel/sched.c	2009-03-20 08:58:13.000000000 +0100
@@ -4629,7 +4629,8 @@ asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule
 	 * If there is a non-zero preempt_count or interrupts are disabled,
 	 * we do not want to preempt the current task. Just return..
 	 */
-	if (likely(ti->preempt_count || irqs_disabled()))
+	if (likely(ti->preempt_count || irqs_disabled() ||
+		   current->state != TASK_RUNNING))
 		return;
 
 	do {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/