Re: Credit for vsprintk work

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Mar 25 2009 - 11:27:44 EST



* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> >
> > Frederic,
> >
> > $ git blame lib/vsprintf.c |grep 'Frederic Weisbecker' | wc -l
> > 542
> >
> > You did a hell of a lot of work on vsprintf.c, and you are still too
> > modest to put in a copyright at the top.
> >
> > I know some people think that git is good enough for ownership. But
> > really, the amount of changes that you did in vsprintf.c deserves a bit of
> > credit in the source file.
> >
> > Is everyone OK if a copyright goes at the top of this file giving credit
> > to Frederic? If for anything else, it will facilitate people to find who
> > broke it if it breaks ;-)
> >
> > I think Frederic should send one more patch to add his copyright. That is,
> > of course, if Frederic wants too.
> >
> > Note, Frederic did not ask me to post this. In fact, this is the first
> > time he's seen this complaint. I'm posting this because I was showing this
> > code to some students at a University and when I wanted to point out
> > who wrote it, I was surprised that Frederic's name was not mentioned.
> > I was looking at the code via LXR so git was not helpful here.
>
> Lai also did this work too, so I recommend adding something like:
>
> * Binary printk modifications, copyright 2009:
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> * Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Or something similar.

I'd suggest the standard copyright form:

*
* Binary printk modifications and generalizations:
*
* Copyright (C) 2009 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
* Copyright (C) 2009 Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/