Re: Linux 2.6.29

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> userspace can do it quite easily.  Run a self-tuning script after
> installation and when the disk hardware changes significantly.

Uhhuh.

"user space can do it".

That's the global cop-out.

The fact is, user-space isn't doing it, and never has done anything even 
_remotely_ like it. 

In fact, I claim that it's impossible to do. If you give me a number for 
the throughput of your harddisk, I will laugh in your face and call you a 
moron.

Why? Because no such number exists. It depends on the access patterns. If 
you write one large file, the number will be very different (and not just 
by a few percent) from the numbers of you writing thousands of small 
files, or re-writing a large database in random order.

So no. User space CAN NOT DO IT, and the fact that you even claim 
something like that shows a distinct lack of thought.

> Maybe we should set the tunables to 99.9% to make it suck enough to
> motivate someone.

The only times tunables have worked for us is when they auto-tune. 

IOW, we don't have "use 35% of memory for buffer cache" tunables, we just 
dynamically auto-tune memory use. And no, we don't expect user space to 
run some "tuning program for their load" either.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/