Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: include inverse Xmas tree patches

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 06:07:46PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:18:50PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > The following changes since commit 29219683c46cb89edf5c58418b5305b14646d030:
> >   Ingo Molnar (1):
> >         Merge branches 'x86/apic', 'x86/cleanups', 'x86/mm', 'x86/pat', 'x86/setup' and 'x86/signal'; commit 'v2.6.29' into x86/core
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-Xmas.git x86/core
> > 
> > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (49):
> >       x86: process_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> 
> What the heck is this?

Ordering include based on length of line minimize the
risk of merge conflicts.
If people just add new includes in the bottom of the list you
are certain that a merge conflit happens.

This scheme is starting to be used in several places with the
primary advocates being David Miller and Ingo.

It is getting used both for includes _and_ for local variables.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/