Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] blktrace: last round of fixes

[Ingo Molnar]

* Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is the last round of fixes for blktrace, I hope.  :) 
> 
> Changelog v1 -> v2:
>   - fix a bug in "blktrace: make classic output more classic",
>     and rebase other patches.
>   - re-order patches.
>   - a new patch for filtering BLK_TN_MESSAGE
> 
> [PATCH v2 1/6] trace: make 'mem' argument of trace_seq_putmem() const
> [PATCH v2 2/6] blktrace: make classic output more classic
> [PATCH v2 3/6] blktrace: fix blk_probes_ref chaos
> [PATCH v2 4/6] blktrace: fix memory leak when freeing struct blk_io_trace
> [PATCH v2 5/6] blktrace: extract duplidate code
> [PATCH v2 6/6] blktrace: print out BLK_TN_MESSAGE properly
> ---
>  blktrace.c     |  188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  trace_output.c |    6 -
>  trace_output.h |    5 -
>  3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)

Li, Jens - what's your call for v2.6.30, can the blktrace changes go 
upstream or should i zap the whole thing?

There are no new -tip test failures here so it's green as far as i'm 
concerned. It's holding up the tracing tree so we need to decide one 
way or another.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/