Re: [PATCH 4/4] add ksm kernel shared memory driver.

From: Anthony Liguori
Date: Tue Mar 31 2009 - 09:31:51 EST


Izik Eidus wrote:

I belive using ioctl for registering memory of applications make it easier....

Yes, I completely agree.

Ksm doesnt have any complicated API that would benefit from sysfs (beside adding more complexity)

That is, the KSM_START_STOP_KTHREAD part, not necessarily the rest of the API.

What you mean?

The ioctl(KSM_START_STOP_KTHREAD) API is distinct from the rest of the API. Whereas the rest of the API is used by applications to register their memory with KSM, this API is used by ksmctl to allow parameters to be tweaked in userspace.

These parameters are just simple values like enable, pages_to_scan, sleep_time. Then there is KSM_GET_INFO_KTHREAD which provides a read interface to these parameters.

You could drop KSM_START_STOP_KTHREAD and KSM_GET_INFO_KTHREAD altogether, and introduce a sysfs hierarchy:

/sysfs/<some/path>/ksm/{enable,pages_to_scan,sleep_time}

That eliminates the need for ksmctl altogether, cleanly separates the two APIs, and provides a stronger interface.

The main problem with the current API is that it uses a single device to do both the administrative task and the userspace interface. That means that any application that has access to registering its memory with KSM also has the ability to disable KSM. That seems like a security concern to me since registering a memory region ought to be an unprivileged action whereas enabling/disabling KSM ought to be a privileged action.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori


Regards,

Anthony Liguori



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/