[patch 07/45] xfrm: spin_lock() should be spin_unlock() in xfrm_state.c

[Chris Wright]

-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
---------------------

From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 7d0b591c655ca0d72ebcbd242cf659a20a8995c5 ]

spin_lock() should be spin_unlock() in xfrm_state_walk_done().

caused by:
commit 12a169e7d8f4b1c95252d8b04ed0f1033ed7cfe2
"ipsec: Put dumpers on the dump list"

Reported-by: Marc Milgram <mmilgram@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -1615,7 +1615,7 @@ void xfrm_state_walk_done(struct xfrm_st
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_state_lock);
 	list_del(&walk->all);
-	spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_state_lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&xfrm_state_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_walk_done);
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/