Re: Q: check_unsafe_exec() races (Was: [PATCH 2/4] fix setuidsometimes doesn't)

[Hugh Dickins]

On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> Rebased and pushed (same tree, same branch; included into for-next, along
> with related cleanups).

for-next?  But don't we need all this (or at least the first four of
your five, on top of the four Linus took from me) in -stable now?

I was wondering if we should ask Chris to do a 2.6.29.1-rc2 with
them; but perhaps you'd much rather expose them in -next for a
while, before sending Linus and 2.6.29.2.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/