Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:36:07 Gregory Haskins wrote:
You do not need to know when the packet is copied (which I currentlyBut if you have a UP guest,
do). You only need it for zero-copy (of which I would like to support,
but as I understand it there are problems with the reliability of proper
callback (i.e. skb->destructor).
I assume you mean UP host ;)
Hmm..well I was hoping to be able to work with you guys to make my
proposal fit this role. If there is no interest in that, I hope that my
infrastructure itself may still be considered for merging (in *some*
tree, not -kvm per se) as I would prefer to not maintain it out of tree
if it can be avoided.