Re: [PATCH] v3 RCU: the bloatwatch edition

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:44:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 00:36:05 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Andrew, what do you think?
> 
> I'm really struggling to see how the 900-odd bytes saved justifies
> creating (yet another) variant of core kernel machinery.
> 
> > A worry is yet another RCU variant - we already have 3.
> 
> That would make four?

Three, once treercu is deemed stable enough to permit dropping Classic RCU.

						Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/