Re: [PATCH] v3 RCU: the bloatwatch edition

[Lennert Buytenhek]

On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 08:52:41AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:

> >> Andrew, what do you think?
> >
> > I'm really struggling to see how the 900-odd bytes saved justifies
> > creating (yet another) variant of core kernel machinery.
> 
> Also it's unclear if anything special cased !SMP is worth it for the
> future.  After all multi core or SMT is becoming more and more common
> even in the embedded world.

At least for ARM, >99% of the dual core CPUs out there are non-SMP.
(With one core typically running Linux and another core typically not
running an OS at all: packet processing, DSP things, baseband stack,
etc.  That second CPU core often doesn't even have an MMU.)  I don't
think any SMP ARMs have been widely deployed yet.

Even if SMP ARM chips become widely available: the die area size of
a chip alone pretty much tells you the cost of that chip, and in a
world where every sub-mm^2 reduction in area matters a _lot_, I doubt
ARM CPU manufacturers will start including second CPU cores in chips
meant for things like cell phones, wireless access points and broadband
routers (ARM CPUs tend to be highly application-specific) just because
they can.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/