Re: [PATCH 00/15] various perf counter bits

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Apr 07 2009 - 05:21:35 EST



* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> new features:
> - event limit
> - record time stamps
> - SIGIO support
>
> fixes:
> - mlock accounting
> - swcounter task clock vs NMI readout deadlock
> - comments and such

Looks good so i've applied it, but got this build-failure on 32-bit:

kernel/perf_counter.c:2345: error: implicit declaration of function atomic64_xchg

atomic64_xchg() is not implemented yet on the 32-bit side.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/