Re: [PATCH] Remove double initialization of retval in load_misc_binary()

[Vitaly Mayatskikh]

At Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:32:48 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:

> Probably, better way is removing both 'retval = -ENOEXEC;'  and initialize it within definition.

Agree.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@xxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/fs/binfmt_misc.c b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
index c4e8353..f10150f 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_misc.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
@@ -109,14 +109,12 @@ static int load_misc_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	struct file * interp_file = NULL;
 	char iname[BINPRM_BUF_SIZE];
 	char *iname_addr = iname;
-	int retval;
+	int retval = -ENOEXEC;
 	int fd_binary = -1;
 
-	retval = -ENOEXEC;
 	if (!enabled)
 		goto _ret;
 
-	retval = -ENOEXEC;
 	if (bprm->recursion_depth > BINPRM_MAX_RECURSION)
 		goto _ret;
 

-- 
wbr, Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/