Re: Regression in 2.6.30-rc1 since commit acae0515 - wireless broken

[Larry Finger]

Alan Jenkins wrote:
> On 4/8/09, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Something is very wrong with request_module(), this is just the most
> obvious symptom.  It also seems to affect libusual (loading
> usb-storage) and FAT (loading NLS modules).
> 
> If I hotplug my wireless device, it then loads correctly.  So I'm
> guessing wireless modules e.g. encryption modules get loaded too
> asynchronously.   I.e. on boot, the  sub-modules are loaded too late.
> But when I hotplug the device, the modules are already loaded.
> 
> Same with FAT - it fails on first attempt to mount because of missing
> NLS module, then works on second mount,
> 
> I agree that commit looks like it should be a no-op though :-).
> I will try to confirm the OP's bisection by reverting the commit, acae0515.

I added printk's to the entry and exit from __request_module and obtained the
following:

module: __request_module entered for module snd-hda-codec-id:14f15051
module: loading module snd-hda-codec-id:14f15051 - call_usermodehelper returned 0
module: __request_module entered for module ecb(arc4)
module: loading module ecb(arc4) - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module ecb
module: loading module ecb - call_usermodehelper returned 0
module: __request_module entered for module char-major-4-68
module: loading module char-major-4-68 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module char-major-4
module: loading module char-major-4 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module char-major-4-69
module: loading module char-major-4-69 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module char-major-4
module: loading module char-major-4 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module char-major-4-70
module: loading module char-major-4-70 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module char-major-4
module: loading module char-major-4 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module char-major-4-71
module: loading module char-major-4-71 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module char-major-4
module: loading module char-major-4 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256
module: __request_module entered for module net-pf-10
module: loading module net-pf-10 - call_usermodehelper returned 256

According to the description of the routine, it should return 0 on success and a
negative number for an error. Where do the values of "256" mean?

Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/