Re: [2.6.30-rc1] RCU detected CPU 1 stall

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Fri Apr 10 2009 - 20:48:27 EST


On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:39:20AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 04:12:45PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 06:08:54AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > Tetsuo, how many tasks did you have on this machine?
> > > I didn't count how many tasks were running on this machine.
> > > But the number of tasks should be very low, for this happened during
> > > the boot stage of Debian Sarge.
> > >
> > > 30 seconds ago from the first stalled message
> > >
> > > [ 41.415158] INFO: RCU detected CPU 1 stall (t=4294902646/2500 jiffies)
> > > [ 41.417332] Pid: 3487, comm: khelper Tainted: G W 2.6.30-rc1 #1
> > > [ 41.417332] Call Trace:
> > >
> > > the system was doing
> > >
> > > [ 10.555521] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> > > [ 10.556727] EXT3 FS on sdb1, internal journal
> > > [ 10.556727] EXT3-fs: recovery complete.
> > > [ 10.557585] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with writeback data mode.
> > > /dev/sdb1 on /usr/src/all type ext3 (rw,noatime,nodiratime)
> > > Detecting hardware: agpgart pcnet32 piix BusLogic ide_scsi
> > > Skipping unavailable/built-in agpgart module.
> > > pcnet32 disabled in configuration.
> > > Skipping unavailable/built-in piix module.
> > > Skipping unavailable/built-in BusLogic module.
> > > Skipping unavailable/built-in ide_scsi module.
> > > Running 0dns-down to make sure resolv.conf is ok...done.
> > > Setting up networking...done.
> > > Starting hotplug subsystem:
> > > pci
> > > ignoring pci display device 00:0f.0
> > > [ 16.727603] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [ 16.729910] WARNING: at security/security.c:217 security_vm_enough_memory+0xa0/0xb0()
> > >
> > > > Though I too find it hard to believe that there were enough to chew up
> > > > two minutes. Maybe the list got corrupted so that it has a loop?
> > >
> > > I powered off the machine after two minutes, for I thought the loop
> > > was infinite.
> >
> > Is this reproducible? If so, any chance you could try bisecting?
>
> If that's execve() hang, we probably have something->fs->lock stuck.
> I don't see any likely candidates, but...
>
> I'd really love to see results of repeated alt-sysrq-p/alt-sysrq-l, just
> to see where was it actually spinning.

Even better!!! ;-)

Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/