Re: [tip:x86/setup] x86, setup: "glove box" BIOS calls -- infrastructure

[H. Peter Anvin]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Yes, we could do memory checks, and ... hey, we already do that:
>>
>>    bb577f9: x86: add periodic corruption check
>>    5394f80: x86: check for and defend against BIOS memory corruption
>>
>> ... and i seem to be the one who implemented it! ;-)
> 
> s/implemented/merged+fixed :-)

Actually, what would probably be more productive than trying to track
corruption would be to drop the low 1 MB of memory before suspend to RAM
- make sure that it is as close to completely unused as possible.

All *known* cases of low memory corruption are either boot time or due
to s2ram.

I don't know how realistic it is to make the low 1 MB completely unused
over the s2ram cycle.  The trivial way of doing it is to simply not use
it -- it's only some 600K after all; a more sophisticated way would be
to explicitly constrain it to transient uses that would be dead at s2ram.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/