[PATCH] rculist: use list_entry_rcu in places where it'sappropriate

From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Tue Apr 14 2009 - 14:17:50 EST


Use previously introduced list_entry_rcu instead of list_entry + rcu_dereference
combination.

Jirka

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 8 +++++---
ipc/sem.c | 4 ++--
security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 4 ++--
security/smack/smackfs.c | 8 ++++----
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index b4c38bc..886df41 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct sched_param {
#include <linux/proportions.h>
#include <linux/seccomp.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/rculist.h>
#include <linux/rtmutex.h>

#include <linux/time.h>
@@ -2010,7 +2011,8 @@ static inline unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p,
}
#endif

-#define next_task(p) list_entry(rcu_dereference((p)->tasks.next), struct task_struct, tasks)
+#define next_task(p) \
+ list_entry_rcu((p)->tasks.next, struct task_struct, tasks)

#define for_each_process(p) \
for (p = &init_task ; (p = next_task(p)) != &init_task ; )
@@ -2049,8 +2051,8 @@ int same_thread_group(struct task_struct *p1, struct task_struct *p2)

static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p)
{
- return list_entry(rcu_dereference(p->thread_group.next),
- struct task_struct, thread_group);
+ return list_entry_rcu(p->thread_group.next,
+ struct task_struct, thread_group);
}

static inline int thread_group_empty(struct task_struct *p)
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 16a2189..87c2b64 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1290,8 +1290,8 @@ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
int i;

rcu_read_lock();
- un = list_entry(rcu_dereference(ulp->list_proc.next),
- struct sem_undo, list_proc);
+ un = list_entry_rcu(ulp->list_proc.next,
+ struct sem_undo, list_proc);
if (&un->list_proc == &ulp->list_proc)
semid = -1;
else
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index ffbe259..510186f 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ static void *ima_measurements_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
* against concurrent list-extension
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- qe = list_entry(rcu_dereference(qe->later.next),
- struct ima_queue_entry, later);
+ qe = list_entry_rcu(qe->later.next,
+ struct ima_queue_entry, later);
rcu_read_unlock();
(*pos)++;

diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
index e03a7e1..11d2cb1 100644
--- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
+++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
@@ -734,8 +734,8 @@ static void smk_netlbladdr_insert(struct smk_netlbladdr *new)
return;
}

- m = list_entry(rcu_dereference(smk_netlbladdr_list.next),
- struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
+ m = list_entry_rcu(smk_netlbladdr_list.next,
+ struct smk_netlbladdr, list);

/* the comparison '>' is a bit hacky, but works */
if (new->smk_mask.s_addr > m->smk_mask.s_addr) {
@@ -748,8 +748,8 @@ static void smk_netlbladdr_insert(struct smk_netlbladdr *new)
list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);
return;
}
- m_next = list_entry(rcu_dereference(m->list.next),
- struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
+ m_next = list_entry_rcu(m->list.next,
+ struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
if (new->smk_mask.s_addr > m_next->smk_mask.s_addr) {
list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);
return;
--
1.6.0.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/