Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: introduce a list of device addressesdev_addr_list

[Jiri Pirko]

Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:13:57PM CEST, kaber@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:27:50 +0200
>>
>>> Since you obviously need a write lock here to be sure following
>>> can be done by one cpu only.
>>>
>>> You have same problem all over this patch.
>>
>> RTNL semaphore is held across all modification operations.
>
> If this will also be used for multicast lists, changes can happen
> (IPv6) without the RTNL.

Ok, but for dev_addr_X() functions the RTNL mutex is sufficient so I see no
point of adding another lock here. When the multicast handling functions will be
implemented to use netdev_hw_addr and it's layer, then we need to use update
lock in dev_multicast_X.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/