Re: Xtensa patches

[Paul Mundt]

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:56:01AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:30:00 +0900 Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:24:47AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > OK.  I have a random pile if i-dont-know-what xtensa stuff here.
> > > 
> > > xtensa-add-flat-support-checkpatch-fixes.patch
> > > xtensa-variant-specific-code.patch
> > > xtensa-cache-inquiry-and-unaligned-cache-handling-functions.patch
> > > xtensa-s6000-dma-engine-support.patch
> > > xtensa-allow-platform-and-variant-to-initialize-own-irq-chips.patch
> > > xtensa-support-s6000-gpio-irqs-and-alternate-function-selection.patch
> > > s6gmac-xtensa-s6000-on-chip-ethernet-driver.patch
> > > s6gmac-xtensa-s6000-on-chip-ethernet-driver-fix.patch
> > > xtensa-s6105-specific-configuration-for-s6gmac.patch
> > > xtensa-enable-s6gmac-in-s6105_defconfig.patch
> > > xtensa-add-m41t62-rtc-to-s6105-platform.patch
> > > xtensa-enable-m41t80-driver-in-s6105_defconfig.patch
> > > 
> > > I'll drop xtensa-add-flat-support-checkpatch-fixes.patch (as I usually
> > > do when someone merges the base patch but doesn't run checkpatch on it
> > > - hint) and I'll send the rest over at you.
> > > 
> > Presumably the nommu xtensa bits still depend on
> > 
> > flat-fix-data-sections-alignment.patch
> > 
> > ?
> 
> I don't think I ever knew that.
> 
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/9/241

> What's happening with flat-fix-data-sections-alignment.patch, btw?  It
> seems to be stuck.
> 
As far as I know it was just waiting on Mike to comment, as he was the
only other one with concerns. Mike?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/