Re: [PATCH] Add MCE support to KVM

From: Gerd Hoffmann
Date: Mon Apr 20 2009 - 07:23:59 EST


On 04/20/09 11:05, Avi Kivity wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 04/20/09 10:26, Avi Kivity wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
The xen pv-on-hvm drivers use an msr to indicate "please place the
hypercall page here". Handling that in kernel isn't an option IMHO.

The contents of the hypercall page are vendor specific. This can be
handled from userspace (though ideally we'd abstract the cpu vendor
away).

Well, xenner doesn't do vmcalls, so the page isn't vendor specific.

Well, for true pv (not pv-on-hvm) it wouldn't use the MSR, would it?

Yes, the MSR is used for pv-on-hvm only.

It looks different for 32bit / 64bit guests though. And it actually
can be multiple pages (with one msr write per page). So the interface
for in-kernel handling would be more complex than "here is a hypercall
page for you".

To different MSRs, or multiple writes to the same MSR?

Same MSR, multiple writes (page number in the low bits).

cheers,
Gerd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/