Re: [PATCH 2/7] res_counter: introduce ratelimiting attributes

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

Andrea Righi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:15:34AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

>> It's very bad if cacheline of spinlock is different from data field, in
>> future.
>
> Regarding the new attributes, policy can be surely an unsigned int or
> even less (now only 1 bit is used!), maybe we can just add an unsigned
> int flags, and encode also potential future informations there.
agreed.

>
> Moreover, are we sure we really need an unsigned long long for failcnt?
>
I think "int" is enough for failcnt.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/