Re: [GIT PULL] x86: cleanup alternative.h

[H. Peter Anvin]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Please try to align both the continuation backslashes and the 
> comments vertically. Something like:
> 
>> +#define ALTERNATIVE(oldinstr, newinstr, feature)			 \
>> +									 \
>> +	"661:\n\t" oldinstr "\n662:\n"					 \
>> +	".section .altinstructions,\"a\"\n"			 	 \
>> +	_ASM_ALIGN "\n"						 	 \
>> +	_ASM_PTR "661b\n"			   /* label           */ \
>> +	_ASM_PTR "663f\n"			   /* new instruction */ \
>> +	 "	 .byte " __stringify(feature) "\n" /* feature bit     */ \
>> +	 "	 .byte 662b-661b\n"		   /* sourcelen       */ \
>> +	 "	 .byte 664f-663f\n"		   /* replacementlen  */ \ 
> 
> ... should do the trick. (also note the extra line after the #define)
> 

This formatting seems a bit odd; _ASM_ALIGN, _ASM_PTR, and .section are
functionally equivalent to the opcode field, as is .byte, so the shift
in indentation for the .byte lines seems odd at best.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/