Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0

From: Thomas Renninger
Date: Wed Apr 29 2009 - 09:20:12 EST


On Monday 20 April 2009 12:45:29 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 20 April 2009 07:13:51 Len Brown wrote:
> > > FYI,
> > > Thanks to Ebay, I now have a T60:-)
> > Hmm, Lenovo sold a lot different machines as T60.
> > I found an acpidump of a T60 here without any _PPC function
> > at all.
> >
> > > and so i put the DSDT here:
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13139
> > >
> > > I'll poke at this in more detail soon...
> > Ingo, can you place yours somewhere too, please.
> > This one should be taken into account for _PPC code changes
> > as it seem to implement some corner case.
>
> Sure, find it attached below.
>
> Ingo
>
> DSDT @ 0x7f6e65e7
> 0000: 44 53 44 54 65 c7 00 00 01 49 4c 45 4e 4f 56 4f
...
Ingo, did you do a BIOS update in between?
The DSDT and SSDTs you added do not contain a _PPC function.
These ACPI tables definitely do not suffer from an initial _PPC
evaluation.

Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/