CC_STACKPROTECTOR vs CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL

[Kees Cook]

Hi,

What is the rationale for why CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL is forced when using
CC_STACKPROTECTOR?  I would have expected _ALL to be a separate option
(as it was in earlier versions), but it seems it is forced on by commit
113c5413cf9051cc50b88befdc42e3402bb92115.

Thanks,

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/