Re: [PATCH] Fix dirty page accounting inredirty_page_for_writepage()

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Ingo Molnar (mingo@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> * Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > 
> > > to have a good look at the memory accounting code. We could 
> > > probably benefit of Christoph Lameter's cpu ops (using segment 
> > > registers to address per-cpu variables with atomic inc/dec) in 
> > > there. Or at least removing interrupt disabling by using preempt 
> > > disable and local_t variables for the per-cpu counters could 
> > > bring some benefit.
> > 
> > Guess we are ready for atomic per cpu ops now that the new per cpu 
> > allocator is in? Segment register issues with the PDA are also 
> > solved right?
> 
> it's all done, implemented and upstream already. You are a bit late 
> to the party ;-)
> 
> 	Ingo

Or way too early, depending on the point of view. :-)

e.g.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/30/3

I think Christoph deserves credits for pioneering this area with fresh
ideas.

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/