Re: [ltt-dev] [PATCH] Fix dirty page accounting inredirty_page_for_writepage()

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Apr 30 2009 - 10:13:40 EST



* Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > I see however that it's only guaranteed to be atomic wrt preemption.
> >
> > That's really only true for the non-x86 fallback defines. If we so
> > decide, we could make the fallbacks in asm-generic/percpu.h irq-safe
>
> The fallbacks have different semantics and therefore we cannot
> rely on irq safeness in the core code when using the x86 cpu ops.

Well it's irq and preempt safe on x86.

It's preempt-safe on other architectures - but the fallback is not
irq-safe on other architectures. That is remedied easily via the
patch below. (Note: totally untested)

Ingo

diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
index 1581ff2..6b3984a 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
@@ -139,17 +139,23 @@ static inline void free_percpu(void *p)
#ifndef percpu_read
# define percpu_read(var) \
({ \
+ unsigned long flags; \
typeof(per_cpu_var(var)) __tmp_var__; \
- __tmp_var__ = get_cpu_var(var); \
- put_cpu_var(var); \
+ \
+ local_irq_save(flags); \
+ __tmp_var__ = __get_cpu_var(var); \
+ local_irq_restore(flags); \
__tmp_var__; \
})
#endif

#define __percpu_generic_to_op(var, val, op) \
do { \
- get_cpu_var(var) op val; \
- put_cpu_var(var); \
+ unsigned long flags; \
+ \
+ local_irq_save(flags); \
+ op val; \
+ local_irq_restore(flags); \
} while (0)

#ifndef percpu_write
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/