Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill-the-BKL/reiserfs3: performance improvements,faster than Bkl based scheme

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri May 01 2009 - 16:37:42 EST



* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The BKL is clearly removed at a faster reate with such debugging
> measures in place. With such measures the BKL _really_ hurts, and
> very visibly so - and that results in active removal.

Btw., if you can think of any way to create a cleaner debug tool
here i'd be glad to start a new tree that adds only _that_ tool -
and that could perhaps be dealt with independently and possibly
pulled upstream too, if clean enough.

The problem is, i think it would still quack like a global mutex,
would walk like a global mutex and would look like a global mutex
:-/

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/