Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
From: Stefan Richter
Date: Sat May 09 2009 - 05:11:42 EST
Kenneth Crudup wrote:
Oh, and I can hit "ESC" in the middle of suspending with TuxOnIce and
back out of it if I'd changed my mind for whatever reason.
There are(/were) competing ieee1394 OHCI drivers and competing Bluetooth
USB HCI drivers, and that's just off the top of my head- so having
competing suspend/resume methods won't be anything new. Let the market
decide which is best.
The case of two 1394 driver stacks isn't fully comparable. I supported
the addition of the second stack with the intent to replace the existing
one after a transition period, and in the hope that the ratio of
available maintainer manpower : size and complexity of the codebase
would improve considerably. Because that was/is the single fundamental
problem in Linux 1394 driver land.
(Besides, how well is infrastructure like the suspend--resume framework
comparable to drivers?)
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/