Re: [PATCH] dup2: Fix return value with oldfd == newfd and invalidfd

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Mon May 11 2009 - 14:45:16 EST




On Mon, 11 May 2009, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>
> The return value of dup2 when oldfd == newfd and the fd isn't valid is not
> getting properly sign extended. We end up with 4294967287 instead of -EBADF.

Indeed.

> This patch uses a signed int for the error value so it is properly extended.

However, I'd rather move the new variable into the block where it is used,
and keep the whole corner-case thing self-contained.

So can you verify that this trivial variation on the patch is ok by you,
and I'll commit it as yours with your message? (I realize it's really
trivial, and I could just do this myself, but good to get the change
ack'ed anyway).

Linus

---
fs/fcntl.c | 6 ++++--
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c
index cc8e4de..1ad7031 100644
--- a/fs/fcntl.c
+++ b/fs/fcntl.c
@@ -117,11 +117,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(dup2, unsigned int, oldfd, unsigned int, newfd)
{
if (unlikely(newfd == oldfd)) { /* corner case */
struct files_struct *files = current->files;
+ int retval = oldfd;
+
rcu_read_lock();
if (!fcheck_files(files, oldfd))
- oldfd = -EBADF;
+ retval = -EBADF;
rcu_read_unlock();
- return oldfd;
+ return retval;
}
return sys_dup3(oldfd, newfd, 0);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/