Re: Misleading OOM messages

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 15 May 2009, Dave Hansen wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 13:57 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > If you misconfigured cgroups, you give more memory to them.
> >
> > If you do not have enough memory in a cgroup then your application should
> > slow down (because of page evictions) but the system should not OOM.
> > Are cgroups broken or why are you getting OOMs when using them?
>
> See mm/oom_kill.c::mem_cgroup_out_of_memory().  A group itself can have
> an OOM done on it.  It's not a system-wide oom.  We just need to ensure
> that we continue to differentiate the cgroup-specific oom message from
> the general one.  Maybe also include some more cgroup info in the debug
> outbut.

But that is a resource control isssue. Should also not say out of memory
but state that the cgroup memory limit was reached.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/