Re: [PATCH block#for-2.6.31 1/3] ub: use __blk_end_request_all()

[Tejun Heo]

Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2009 00:14:35 +0900, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> @@ -834,12 +829,7 @@ static void ub_end_rq(struct request *rq
>>  		error = -EIO;
>>  		rq->errors = scsi_status;
>>  	}
>> -	rqlen = blk_rq_bytes(rq);    /* Oddly enough, this is the residue. */
>> -	if (__blk_end_request(rq, error, cmd_len)) {
>> -		printk(KERN_WARNING DRV_NAME
>> -		    ": __blk_end_request blew, %s-cmd total %u rqlen %ld\n",
>> -		    blk_pc_request(rq)? "pc": "fs", cmd_len, rqlen);
>> -	}
>> +	__blk_end_request_all(rq, error);
>>  }
> 
> I applaud this. We needed blk_end_this_mudafakin_request() for a long time.
> Why two underscores?

The ones with two underscores are to be called with queue lock held.
Ones without grab queue lock themselves.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/