Re: [BUG FIX] Make x86_32 uni-processor Atomic ops, Atomic
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Sun May 24 2009 - 14:00:45 EST
Michael S. Zick wrote:
> @hpa - I still like your suggestion that it is only one (or a few)
> uses of atomic ops that is incorrect and in general atomic ops
> should compile away on uni-processor.
Actually, the more I think about it the more I suspect there is a race
condition either in the chip set or in any VIA-specific drivers (if
there are any.) Putting LOCKs in random places will slow the CPU down
significantly, so it might resolve the race condition without actually
solving the problem.
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/