Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/workqueue: Get rid of searching lastexecuted worklet in probe_worklet_complete()

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Sun May 24 2009 - 17:30:40 EST


On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:40:54AM +0800, Zhaolei wrote:
> We don't need search workqueue's worklet list for worklet which was latest
> executed, instead, we can use a pointer in cpu_workqueue_stats to remember
> which worklet was just executed.
>
> Thanks Oleg for pointing it out.
>
> Changelog:
> v1->v2: Oleg pointed out that if searching executed workfunc_stats failed
> in probe_worklet_execute(), for example, workfunc_stats's memory allocation
> failed previously, cpu_workqueue_stats->last_workfunc is not set to correct
> value, and it will cause wrong accessing in probe_worklet_complete().
> This problem is fixed in v2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good, thanks!

Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>

Frederic.


> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
> index c67be60..740de3b 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
> @@ -25,13 +25,6 @@ struct workfunc_stats {
> unsigned int inserted;
> unsigned int executed;
>
> - /*
> - * save latest work_struct's pointer to use as identifier in
> - * probe_worklet_complete, because we can't use work_struct->...
> - * after worklet got executed
> - */
> - void *work;
> -
> /* save execution time temporarily for calculate executed time */
> u64 start_time;
> u64 max_executed_time;
> @@ -46,10 +39,17 @@ struct cpu_workqueue_stats {
> /* Protected by cpu workqueue lock */
> unsigned int inserted;
> unsigned int executed;
> +
> /* list of struct workfunc_stats in this workqueue */
> struct list_head workfunclist;
>
> /*
> + * pointer to last executed worklet's workfunc_stats in this workqueue,
> + * used by probe_worklet_complete()
> + */
> + struct workfunc_stats *last_workfunc;
> +
> + /*
> * the task maybe destroyed when we read stat file
> * we define it to void * because we only use it as a identifier
> */
> @@ -163,9 +163,10 @@ found_wq:
> if (wfnode->func == work->func) {
> wfnode->executed++;
> wfnode->start_time = trace_clock_global();
> - wfnode->work = work;
> + node->last_workfunc = wfnode;
> goto found_wf;
> }
> + node->last_workfunc = NULL;
> pr_debug("trace_workqueue: worklet not found\n");
> goto end;
>
> @@ -180,7 +181,7 @@ probe_worklet_complete(struct task_struct *wq_thread, void *work)
> {
> int cpu = cpumask_first(&wq_thread->cpus_allowed);
> struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node;
> - struct workfunc_stats *wfnode;
> + u64 executed_time;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
> @@ -192,22 +193,14 @@ probe_worklet_complete(struct task_struct *wq_thread, void *work)
> goto end;
>
> found_wq:
> - list_for_each_entry(wfnode, &node->workfunclist, list) {
> - u64 executed_time;
> + if (!node->last_workfunc)
> + goto end;
>
> - if (wfnode->work != work)
> - continue;
> + executed_time = trace_clock_global() - node->last_workfunc->start_time;
> + node->last_workfunc->total_time += executed_time;
> + if (executed_time > node->last_workfunc->max_executed_time)
> + node->last_workfunc->max_executed_time = executed_time;
>
> - executed_time = trace_clock_global() - wfnode->start_time;
> - wfnode->total_time += executed_time;
> - if (executed_time > wfnode->max_executed_time)
> - wfnode->max_executed_time = executed_time;
> - goto found_wf;
> - }
> - pr_debug("trace_workqueue: worklet not found\n");
> - goto end;
> -
> -found_wf:
> end:
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
> }
> --
> 1.5.5.3
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/