Re: [PATCH 1/7] perf_counter: fix dynamic irq_period logging

From: Paul Mackerras
Date: Sun May 24 2009 - 20:13:48 EST


Peter Zijlstra writes:

> We call perf_adjust_freq() from perf_counter_task_tick() which is is called
> under the rq->lock causing lock recursion.

What was the lock recursion? I see perf_adjust_freq taking ctx->lock,
but we were careful not to take any rq->lock within a ctx->lock, at
least in the past.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/