Re: [GIT PULL] Xen APIC hooks (with io_apic_ops)
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sun May 24 2009 - 23:52:47 EST
* Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> IO APIC operations are not even slightly performance critical? Are
>>> they ever used on the interrupt delivery path?
>> Since they are not performance critical, then why doesnt Xen catch the
>> IO-APIC accesses, and virtualizes the device?
>> If you want to hook into the IO-APIC code at such a low level, why
>> dont you hook into the _hardware_ API - i.e. catch those setup/routing
>> modifications to the IO-APIC space. No Linux changes are needed in that
> When x2apic is enabled, and EOI broadcast is disabled, then the io
> apic does become a hot path - it needs to be written for each
> level-triggered interrupt EOI. In this case I might want to
> paravirtualize the EOI write to exit only if an interrupt is
> pending; otherwise communicate via shared memory.
> We do something similar for Windows (by patching it) very
> successfully; Windows likes to touch the APIC TPR ~ 100,000 times
> per second, usually without triggering an interrupt. We hijack
> these writes, do the checks in guest context, and only exit if the
> TPR write would trigger an interrupt.
I suspect you aware of that this is about the io-apic not the local
APIC. The local apic methods are already driver-ized - and they sit
closer to the CPU so they matter more to performance.
> (kvm will likely gain x2apic support in 2.6.32; patches have
> already been posted)
ok. This points in the direction of the io-apic driver abstraction
from Jeremy being the right long-term approach. We already have a
few quirks that could be cleaned up by using a proper driver
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/