Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ftrace: Add task_comm support for trace_event

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 04:59:26PM +0800, Zhaolei wrote:
> * From: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > it still fails to build:
> > 
> > kernel/built-in.o: In function `ftrace_event_enable_disable':
> > trace_events.c:(.text+0x4df08): undefined reference to `tracing_stop_cmdline_record'
> > trace_events.c:(.text+0x4df1f): undefined reference to `tracing_start_cmdline_record'
> > 
> > config attached.
> 
> Hello, Ingo
> 
> Thanks for your report.
> 
> I found reason.
> It is because CONFIG_TRACING is on(But CONFIG_FTRACE is off),
> which compiles trace_events but leaves trace_sched_switch.
> (It is different with problem that I fixed in v1->v2, but... sorry......)
> 
> I have fixed it, I'll send v3 after following test:
> 1: CONFIG_TRACING on, CONFIG_FTRACE off
> 2: CONFIG_ENABLE_EVENT_TRACING on, CONFIG_ENABLE_CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER off
> 2: CONFIG_ENABLE_EVENT_TRACING on, CONFIG_ENABLE_CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER on
> 
> And RFC:
> IMHO, trace_sched_switch should not have relationship with trace_events,
> in other words, trace_events should run without trace_sched_switch linked.
> 
> Can we move codes for record cmdline out of trace_sched_switch.c and put them
> into new cmdline_record.c?
> Then, trace_functions.c and trace_events.c will only need cmdline_record.c


The problem is that the cmdline recording is very tight to the sched
switch tracer. tracing_start_cmdline_record() registers the sched switch
tracer tracepoints and use them to avoid any loss of pid to cmdline
mapping.

BTW, I have a doubt about this system.
Isn't tracing_record_cmdline() sufficient for that?

We only need to record the cmdline of the traced task, not all
of them.

No?


> 
> Thanks
> Zhaolei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/