Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes for 2.6.30-rc8

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Mon May 25 2009 - 18:51:58 EST




On Mon, 25 May 2009, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> +static void wbinvd_local(void *unused)
> +{
> + wbinvd();
> +}
> +
> static void cpa_flush_array(unsigned long *start, int numpages, int cache,
> int in_flags, struct page **pages)
> {
> @@ -218,8 +223,9 @@ static void cpa_flush_array(unsigned long *start, int numpages, int cache,
>
> /* 4M threshold */
> if (numpages >= 1024) {
> - if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 4)
> - wbinvd();
> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86 >= 4)
> + on_each_cpu(wbinvd_local, NULL, 1);
> +

This looks a bit wrong.

Just above this, we've done

on_each_cpu(__cpa_flush_range, NULL, 1);

and quite frankly, it seems to be that what we _should_ have done is to
instead change that to

long do_wbinvd = cache && numpages >= 1024;

on_each_cpu(__cpa_flush_all, (void *)do_wbinvd, 1);
if (!cache || do_wbinvd)
return;

.. do the cflush dance ..

instead.

Now you made it do two different "on_each_cpu" things. Maybe it doesn't
matter, but it just seems wrong.

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/