Re: [PATCH] libata: add warning about possible HPA compatibility issue
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Mon May 25 2009 - 19:10:48 EST
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 00:38:14 Alan Cox wrote:
> > > NAK - this is extremely misleading and will just randomly terrify users,
> > > who may then set the paramater and corrupt things like BIOS save areas.
> > Please propose better description.
> As was discussed before
> Tejun has a patch in the queue which exposes the HPA and real sizes to
> the OS
In queue for 2.6.30?
> Libata can support revalidating a disc
> Once the HPA/Real size data is there the tools can be tuned for this and
> a sysfs node added to switch hpa on/off per disc. At that point this can
> be done by the user space intelligently.
Unless you happen to have partition with tools in HPA area etc.
Also care to post link to the existing user-space tools with added HPA
support and documentation how to use them so I can start pointing people
reporting problems in this direction?
> The fact this is a user parameter is itself a problem.
Yes. It is a problem but we can't reverse the history.
I fully agree w.r.t to proper handling of HPA but we need "something" in
the meantime because it is *real* issue resulting in *real* users filling
*real* bug-reports (which unfortunately always get assigned to me first
so I'm needlessly wasting my time on them).
IOW Please stop downplaying bug #13365 which this patch tries to alleviate.
I'm adding Andrew to cc:...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/