Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
From: Oliver Neukum
Date: Tue May 26 2009 - 07:07:09 EST
Am Dienstag, 26. Mai 2009 11:19:40 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> For small allocations... I still believe we should free a bit of
> memory for s2ram so that small allocations can be done without
it is essential that this work. Some subsystems, ie. USB, need to allocate
memory to do IO. For them to work, small allocations must be possible.
Now, is this a real issue? Can most devices really save a device state?
This capability seems to me to be limited to memory mapped IO at best.
USB devices generally don't save and restore state but bring the device
into the state it ought to be in, not the state it was in during resumption.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/