Re: [PATCH] readahead:add blk_run_backing_dev
From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Tue May 26 2009 - 22:35:37 EST
> >> >even consumed 9% of a CPU, so where on earth has the kernel gone to?
> >> >
> >> >Have you been able to reproduce this in your testing?
> >> Yes, this test on my environment is reproducible.
> >Hisashi, does your environment have some special configurations?
> My testing environment is as follows:
> Hardware: HP DL580
> CPU:Xeon 3.2GHz *4 HT enabled
> Storage: Dothill SANNet2 FC (7Disks RAID-0 Array)
> I did dd to this disk-array and got improved performance number.
> I noticed that when a disk is just one HDD, performance improvement
> is very small.
Why your patch depend on transfer rate difference?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/