Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform
From: Scott Wood
Date: Wed May 27 2009 - 19:59:44 EST
Robert Schwebel wrote:
The oftree by design wants to be a complete hardware description. As you
mention above, there are cases where you *nevertheless* need ad-hoc
information about things *not* encoded into the device tree.
This renders the whole concept ad absurdum. You need a machine number
again - and if you need that: why not stay with the ARM model, define
everything with platform data and avoid the whole thing?
Because it's better to have a little platform specific code than a lot
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/