Re: [PATCH 00/19] periodic write-back timer optimization
From: Jens Axboe
Date: Thu May 28 2009 - 04:19:06 EST
On Thu, May 28 2009, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>> That would be great, I would have no problem integrating such a feature.
>> It definitely makes sense.
> Hi Al, Christoph,
> unless you have objections against the whole idea, I wonder if
> it would be possible to make the patches which wrap sb->s_dirt
> usage go via VFS tree first, and then I'd continue the timer
> optimization work separately. IMO, wrapping s_dirt makes sense
> in general. I mean, patches 01-17 from this series.
That makese sense, those are totally separate from the actual
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/