Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform

From: Robert Schwebel
Date: Thu May 28 2009 - 10:24:46 EST

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 03:17:43PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> I was wondering what the pros/cons of having a system that takes a
> device tree and manufactures platform devices / etc from it? I think
> one of the cons is that if you change the platform device data, then
> you have not only the board definitions to change, but the of->platform
> code to modify as well...

I think a unification of both data structures would be much better than
having two of them ontop of each other.

Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at