Re: [PATCH 25/20] sysfs: Only support removing emtpy sysfs directories.
From: Alan Stern
Date: Thu May 28 2009 - 13:51:53 EST
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > There's another point to consider. If you do accept my argument that
> > empty targets can be removed from visibility regardless of the host's
> > state, then this removal races with addition of a new child. Since
> > removal involves calling device_del(), it can't be protected by the
> > host lock. Instead we'd have to use a mutex to protect both target
> > addition and target removal.
> Careful. Holding a lock over device_del is an easy and hidden way
> to trigger a rare deadlocks.
Your point is well taken. In addition, I don't really like the idea of
forcing device removal to wait for some other device to be added.
I'll work around the problem somehow... A short polling loop shoud do
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/